Improper Influence is described as privately trying to influence the outcome of a judiciary proceeding with intent toward a public servant. Which option reflects this?

• A. Tampering with Witness
• B. Bribery/ Corrupt Influence
• C. Improper Influence
• D. Obstruction/Retaliation

Answer: (C)

Improper Influence means privately trying to influence the outcome of a judiciary proceeding with the intent toward a public servant. In practice, this is about covertly pressuring or persuading the decision-maker—such as a judge or other official—outside of legitimate or public channels to achieve a desired ruling. The emphasis is on secrecy and intent to affect the decision, rather than using official processes or offering value.

This differs from tampering with a witness, which targets altering a witness’s testimony or behavior; bribery or corrupt influence involves giving or offering something of value to a public official to sway their actions; and obstruction or retaliation covers actions that impede justice or retaliate against someone involved in the case. Because the description centers on privately attempting to influence the outcome toward a public servant, it fits Improper Influence.